welcome: please sign in
location: Diff for "FinalProblemDescriptions/ReverseFolding"
Differences between revisions 2 and 8 (spanning 6 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2011-01-19 10:04:44
Size: 2558
Comment:
Revision 8 as of 2011-01-28 15:12:14
Size: 3018
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
* Input predicates: fold/3, length/1, time/1

* Output predicates: pivot/3
Line 13: Line 9:
A pivot move is defined by selecting an element i in {2,...,N-1} and its effect is to turn clockwise or counter-clockwise of 90 degrees the part of the string related to the elements i+1,...,N.

A move at time t is represented by pivot(t,i,clock) or pivot(t,i,anticlock). Exactly one move occurs at a time t.
A pivot move is defined by selecting an element i in {2,...,N-1} and its effect is to turn clockwise or counter-clockwise of 90 degrees the part of the string related to the elements i+1,...,N. A move at time t is represented by pivot(t,i,clock) or pivot(t,i,anticlock). Exactly one move occurs at a time t.
Line 18: Line 12:
fold(1,N,N). fold(2,N,N+1). fold(2,N,N+2). ... fold(N,N,2N-1).
{{{
fold(1,N,N). fold(2,N,N+1). fold(2,N,N+2). ... fold(N,N,2N-1).}}}
Line 21: Line 17:
Assume the input is:

fold(1,9,9). <<BR>>
fold(2,9,10). <<BR>>
fold(3,9,11). <<BR>>
fold(4,10,11). <<BR>>
fold(5,11,11). <<BR>>
fold(6,11,10). <<BR>>
fold(7,11,9). <<BR>>
fold(8,10,9). <<BR>>
fold(9,10,10). <<BR>>

length(9). <<BR>>
time(4). <<BR>>
Ideas on modeling with variants of ASP can be found in: <<BR>>
A. Dovier, A. Formisano, E. Pontelli. <<BR>>
Perspectives on Logic-based Approaches for Reasoning About Actions and Change. <<BR>>
To appear in LNCS 6565, Essay in honour of Michael Gelfond <<BR>>
(paper draft available on line)
Line 37: Line 24:
== Predicates ==

 * '''Input''': {{{fold/3, length/1, time/1}}}

 * '''Output''': {{{pivot/3}}}

== Input format ==

== Output format ==

== Example(s) ==

Assume the input is:
{{{
fold(1,9,9).
fold(2,9,10).
fold(3,9,11).
fold(4,10,11).
fold(5,11,11).
fold(6,11,10).
fold(7,11,9).
fold(8,10,9).
fold(9,10,10).

length(9).
time(4).
}}}
Line 38: Line 52:
{{{
Line 39: Line 54:
  | | <<BR>>
  | |_| <<BR>>
  | |
  | |_|
}}}
Line 45: Line 61:
{{{
pivot(1,3,clock).
pivot(2,5,clock).
pivot(3,8,clock).
pivot(4,7,clock).
}}}
Effects of pivot moves
{{{
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 | | | | | | | |
 | | | | | | | |_|
                        | _|
                        |
}}}
Line 46: Line 81:
pivot(1,3,clock). <<BR>>
pivot(2,5,clock). <<BR>>
pivot(3,8,clock). <<BR>>
pivot(4,7,clock). <<BR>>
== Notes and Updates ==
Line 51: Line 83:
Effects of pivot moves Different elements must occupy different positions only at discrete time points.
The case in which elements overlap during rotation from one time point to another is not to be considered.
Line 53: Line 86:
 | <<BR>>
 | <<BR>>
 | <<BR>>
 | <<BR>>
 | <<BR>>
 | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <<BR>>
 | | | | | | | | <<BR>>
 | | | | | | | |_| <<BR>>
                        | _| <<BR>>
                        | <<BR>>

Ideas on modeling with variants of ASP can be found in: <<BR>>
A. Dovier, A. Formisano, E. Pontelli.
Perspectives on Logic-based Approaches for Reasoning About Actions and Change.
To appear in LNCS 6565, Essay in honour of Michael Gelfond
(paper draft available on line)
== Author(s) ==
 * Author: Agostino Dovier
   * Affiliation: University of Udine, Italy
 * Author: Andrea Formisano
   * Affiliation: University of Perugia, Italy
 * Author: Enrico Pontelli
   * Affiliation: New Mexico State University, USA

Reverse Folding

Problem Description

This is a simplification of an important Biological problem. A string (e.g., representing a protein) composed of N consecutive elements (defined by the predicate length(N)) at a fixed unitary distance lays on a 2D (cartesian) plane. Admissible angles are 0 (straight line), .90. (left turn) and +90. (right turn). Different elements must occupy different positions. We refer to each placement of the string as a folding. A folding is represented by a predicate fold(I,X,Y) where I in {1,...,N} is the Ith element of the string, and (X,Y) are its coordinates in the plane. You can assume X and Y in {0,...,2N}.

A pivot move is defined by selecting an element i in {2,...,N-1} and its effect is to turn clockwise or counter-clockwise of 90 degrees the part of the string related to the elements i+1,...,N. A move at time t is represented by pivot(t,i,clock) or pivot(t,i,anticlock). Exactly one move occurs at a time t.

The goal is to find (if it exists) a sequence of T moves (T is defined by the predicate time(T)) such that lead the initial straight line fold

fold(1,N,N). fold(2,N,N+1). fold(2,N,N+2). ... fold(N,N,2N-1).

into the fold assigned as input.

Ideas on modeling with variants of ASP can be found in:
A. Dovier, A. Formisano, E. Pontelli.
Perspectives on Logic-based Approaches for Reasoning About Actions and Change.
To appear in LNCS 6565, Essay in honour of Michael Gelfond
(paper draft available on line)

Predicates

  • Input: fold/3, length/1, time/1

  • Output: pivot/3

Input format

Output format

Example(s)

Assume the input is:

fold(1,9,9). 
fold(2,9,10). 
fold(3,9,11). 
fold(4,10,11). 
fold(5,11,11). 
fold(6,11,10). 
fold(7,11,9). 
fold(8,10,9). 
fold(9,10,10). 

length(9). 
time(4). 

This means that the the final form of the protein is

   _ _
  |   | 
  | |_|

Starting from the straight line fold, it is possible to reach that folding with the application of the following pivot moves (which is the expected output from the system):

pivot(1,3,clock). 
pivot(2,5,clock). 
pivot(3,8,clock). 
pivot(4,7,clock). 

Effects of pivot moves

 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 |    _ _ _ _ _ _    _ _     _ _     _ _ 
 |   |              |   |   |   |   |   | 
 |   |              |   |   |   |   | |_| 
                        |      _| 
                        | 

Notes and Updates

Different elements must occupy different positions only at discrete time points. The case in which elements overlap during rotation from one time point to another is not to be considered.

Author(s)

  • Author: Agostino Dovier
    • Affiliation: University of Udine, Italy
  • Author: Andrea Formisano
    • Affiliation: University of Perugia, Italy
  • Author: Enrico Pontelli
    • Affiliation: New Mexico State University, USA

ASP Competition 2011: FinalProblemDescriptions/ReverseFolding (last edited 2011-02-07 19:49:50 by MarioAlviano)