Size: 4883
Comment:
|
← Revision 11 as of 2013-03-16 12:00:33 ⇥
Size: 4674
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 29: | Line 29: |
* '''Output''': {{{yes}}} or {{{no}}} | * '''Output''': {{{yes}}} or {{{no}}} (meant as the propositional assertions {{{yes.}}} and {{{no.}}}) |
Line 52: | Line 52: |
The output must be {{{yes}}} or {{{no}}}. | The output must be {{{yes.}}} or {{{no.}}} intended as {{{0}}}-ary facts. See the specification for outputs of query problems, [[https://www.mat.unical.it/aspcomp2013/files/aspoutput.txt|here]]. |
Line 56: | Line 56: |
yes | no. |
Line 59: | Line 59: |
<<BR>> (Technical details about actual input/output format will be available via the Competition website) |
|
Line 77: | Line 74: |
no | yes. |
Line 89: | Line 86: |
== Notes and updates == Note that this is a search problem, despite the seemingly presence of a ''query'' in input. With respect to former edition of the competition, the output format requires an entire strategic set to be output, and not just the subpart of the set showing that c,,1,, and c,,2,, belong to it. |
Strategic Companies
Problem Description
Strategic companies is a well-known NP^NP-complete problem that has often been used for systems comparisons, and also in the previous ASP Competitions. In the Strategic Companies problem, a collection C = c1, ..., cm of companies is given, for some m >= 1. Each company produces some goods in a set G, and each company ci in C is possibly controlled by a set of owner companies Oi (where Oi is a subset of C, for each i = 1,...,m). In this context, a set C' of companies (i.e., a subset of C) is a "strategic set" if it is minimal among all the sets satisfying the following conditions:
- Companies in C' produce all goods in G;
If Oi is a subset of C', the associated company ci must belong to C'(for each i=1,...,m).
In our setting, instances are subject to two additional restrictions:
- each product is produced by at most four companies; and
each company is controlled by at most four companies.
Under these restrictions the problem is still NP^NP-complete.
Instances of strategic companies are encoded by means of the predicates produced_by and controlled_by. In particular, there is a fact producedBy(p,c1,c2,c3,c4) when a product p is produced by companies c1, c2, c3 and c4, and a fact controlledBy(c,c1,c2,c3,c4) when a company c is controlled by companies c1, c2, c3 and c4. If a product p is produced by less than four companies (but at least one), the atom produced_by(p,c_a,c_b,c_c,c_d) contains repetitions of companies. For instance, producedBy(p,c_a,c_b,c_c,c_c) is used for representing that p is produced solely by ca, cb, and cc. Analogously, if a company c is controlled by less than four companies.
The goal of the problem is a follows: Given two distinct companies ci,cj in C, we ask for checking whether no strategic set C' containing both ci and cj does exist. Queries of this benchmark have thus to be answered cautiously.
Predicates
Input: produced_by/5, controlled_by/5, strategic_pair/2, non_strategic_pair/2
Output: yes or no (meant as the propositional assertions yes. and no.)
Input format
An instance of Strategic Companies is modeled by the following facts that will be provided in the input file:
- A set of facts of the form produced_by(p,c1,c2,c3,c4), where produced_by(p,c1,c2,c3,c4) means that product P is produced by companies c1, c2, c3 and c4;
- A set of facts of the form controlled_by(c,c1,c2,c3,c4), where controlled_by(c,c1,c2,c3,c4) means that company c is jointly controlled by c1, c2, c3 and c4;
- A ground query of the form non_strategic_pair(c1,c2)?, specifying the query goal, i.e., whether no strategic set containing both c1 and c2 does exist.
For instance:
produced_by(pasta,barilla,dececco,dececco,dececco). produced_by(tonno,callipo,star,star,star). controlled_by(barilla,star,star,star,star). controlled_by(dececco,barilla,barilla,barilla,barilla). non_strategic_pair(barilla,star)?
Output format
The output must be yes. or no. intended as 0-ary facts. See the specification for outputs of query problems, here.
For instance:
no.
Example(s)
Input:
produced_by(pasta,barilla,dececco,dececco,dececco). produced_by(tonno,callipo,star,star,star). controlled_by(barilla,star,star,star,star). controlled_by(dececco,barilla,barilla,barilla,barilla). non_strategic_pair(barilla, callipo)?
Output:
yes.
Additional sample instances: download
Problem Peculiarities
Type: search/Beyond-NP Competition: both M&S and System competition
This problem is challenging both from the modelling point of view (it is required the availability of constructs allowing an "\exist \forall" quantification over solutions, or some appropriate optimization construct), and from the computational point of view.
Author(s)
- Author: Mario Alviano
- Affiliation: University of Calabria, Italy
- Original Authors: Marco Maratea, Francesco Ricca
- Affiliation: University of Genova and University of Calabria, Italy